![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2021 
				Location: New Zealand 
				
				
					Posts: 298
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The sword arrived yesterday, so can put up some more photos. My first impression is that it's a lot lighter than I expected, at 860 grams. The blade is 830mm long, but has lost a bit off the point.  
		
		
		
			It's also quite thin: (Profile / Distal taper) 
 Although this profile is similar to the backsword blade on my 1796 HC dress sword: 
 I'm guessing that the grip wire was redone at some point, possibly in the 1800s? Although the Turkshead knot looks good so it might be older but that seems unlikely. All in all an interesting piece, even with the peculiar 'panel' on the blade. Will need to keep an eye open for similar blade profiles to compare.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2021 
				Location: Leiden, NL 
				
				
					Posts: 617
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			* Drool * 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	The engraving on the rear of the guard is a green man I assume, but what is engraved on the sides? It almost looks like a flower wearing a wig.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2021 
				Location: New Zealand 
				
				
					Posts: 298
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 But as swords with these decorations were carried by both sides of the English Civil War, and there exist examples that can be dated to before the death of Charles II, this is an unlikely explanation. Possibly another one of those mysteries that can only be resolved with a time machine  
		 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2017 
				Location: Tyneside. North-East England 
				
				
					Posts: 722
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It's a Green Man... or a variation on the theme. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			As was said, Charles the first was beheaded as a result of the civil war. I have Shotley Bridge swords, and have seen others, with that same face... often where the leaves, that are pertinent to the imagery, have worn away with just the face left behind. BTW, it is a magnificent sword. Last edited by urbanspaceman; 13th October 2022 at 11:35 AM. Reason: correction  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Room 101, Glos. UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,259
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Another found online:
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2021 
				Location: New Zealand 
				
				
					Posts: 298
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thank you all for the feedback and the additional examples Jim and Kronckew. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Jim, I'd be interested to hear how the dimensions of the blade on your example compare to mine.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2021 
				Location: New Zealand 
				
				
					Posts: 84
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I'm not sure that the face qualifies as a green man, while it has a foliage pattern around it it is not truly part of it. The true green man figure often has leaves for hair and branches emerging from the mouth. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Also worth noting that the green man symbols are a complete enigma we have no record of what they meant to the people who carved them and the "ancient woodland deity" theory was made up out of thin air by a Victorian "researcher". Robert  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |