![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 264
|
![]()
Actually one of the last written books for Destreza.
Principios universales y reglas generales de la verdadera destreza del espadín : segun la doctrina mixta de... (1805) - by Manuel Antonio de Brea. was so for smallsword. https://bibliotecadigital.jcyl.es/es...tro.do?id=9776 Possibly this would be the closest to El Zorro fencing manual you could find... Yesterday I got this 1meter long Colichemarde with functional pas d'ane. A not so small smallsword, probably Spanish. Last edited by midelburgo; 14th January 2022 at 05:21 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]() Quote:
In a 1927 paper I found that in the northwest colonial regions of Mexico and New Mexico small swords were present, and one of the forms was colichemarde. I have yet to find more, but I suspect that small sword blades were produced in Bilbao which was a port exporting to the colonies. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,224
|
![]() Quote:
I gather that Colichemardes were in general all around a metre, considereably longer than an average smallsword. George Washington is frequently painted with his favourite colichemarde. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]() Quote:
Actually I am not certain about lengths of these blades' generality, but the initial course of their development with the widened forte for parry, and the foible remaining narrow for speed seems to have been attuned to dueling. With that being the case with the attention to the requirement for a fast blade, it seems shorter was the preference. In the case of the forementioned colichemarde suggesting its possibly being Spanish, I would say that might be supported by the 39" blade. Spaniards favored remarkably long blades, one rapier blade I have is 41" (of traditional narrow form c. 1700), but I have heard of up to 45". Ive heard of Washington's colichemarde, and it is noted that while these were out of favor in the civilian sector they remained popular with military through the 18th c. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,224
|
![]()
I was referring to the overall length. Mine is just over 38 in. long, 33 inch blade.
GW's Colichemarde: Mt. Vernon collection. (Not on Display) a hair or two over a metre long. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 264
|
![]()
The colichemarde in question arrived, and it had a couple of nice surprises (the original description was very poor). Indeed Spanish with two inscriptions:
M O N T E E N TOLEDO D E P E D R O V I E L Possibly Pedro Biel was the first owner. The blade originally was a rapier one, and only later transformed as a colichemarde. Hilt is filthy, but it could be silver. I will make pictures later. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
Wayne thank you so much for adding that, Washington's colichemarde, very notable! Stuart Mowbray co authored a book on Washington;s swords. It is interesting to see just how important the 'culture of the sword' remained as a point of honor long after the advent of firearms had rendered it quite 'secondary' as a weapon.
Midelburgo, very exciting on the arrival of this sword and looking forward to pics. I think your assessment on the blade is right and am curious at how a rapier blade became colichemarde considering how narrow they are. I know a lot of rapier blades were mounted in smallswords. When rapiers ended up in California according to some accounts, the blades were shortened. The one blade (unmounted) I have I think is about 1700, has JESUS one side MARIA the other, a Toledo mark, and about 41" long. Found in Panama off a shipwreck. I dont have access presently, but need to get pics of markings. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 264
|
![]()
I had a photo session yesterday.
The sword is 1.03 m total length. The blade comes from a Rapier. There are known dated works from this swordsmith, Pedro del Monte, in 1610 and 1630. I have seen Pedro del Monte described as somebody that made colichemardes, but probably his blades were apropiate to make colichemardes afterwards. A new bevel has been created, recessed from the original blade, and this has a less acute angle. Old repair on the hilt. Hilt is brass. Cleaning still proceeding. Now I believe the inscription, changing sides reads: D E P E D R O D E E L M O N T E E N T O L E D O (No Pedro Viel) Last edited by midelburgo; 16th February 2022 at 02:29 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|