![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Emanuel,
That's the problem: Anosov described his "bulats" as being Taban and Khorasan. But please re-read Kirill's e-mail to me: the definitions at that time were different and imprecise. Thus, personal definitions of bulat patterns mentioned by Anosov are unreliable. Indeed, we have not a single known example of his "bulat" with anything but the simplest Sham. The only proof of his definitions would consist of actual examples. And, by the way, I could not find any message on the Russian forum about Anosov's bulats having "...very different structures, including the most complex" |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
Quite the impasse then Ariel.
Fascinating either way though. This has been a most enjoyable thread
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
I wouldn't be so pessimistic. Perhaps, some of our colleagues from Russia can get into Anosov's collections and post here pics of documented and clearly labeled blades with truly complex patterns. I, for one, would be delighted to see them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,730
|
Quote:
![]() I feel sad that the Russian forum has been deprived of you guys great debate.....but lucky us. On the bright side, I personally have learned a great deal on wootz, and perhaps a few things about human nature. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|