![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,220
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 928
|
![]()
This ancestor Aso motif can be seen in a lot of book about Borneo tribes art .. all written in english language with many pics and also accurate description about meaning and symbolism (for example: hornbill and dragon, borneo and beyond, the eloquent dead,.... ).
IMO to put a keris on this kind of board is the same to put a little ET in crib...but of course is only my personal taste ...Here some keris hits with (i suppose) borneo patterns |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,220
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Still i am hoping that we might be able to identify the actual tribe this came from through the particular style of this carving. Maybe i should move this over to the main forum since some of our Dayak experts might not have seen this over here on the keris forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]()
How about this "Rangda", ratu leak of Balinese magic world? (A picture from somewhere...)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,220
|
![]()
Ganja, i am not sure what, if any, relationship exists between Rangda and this image, but the similarities with it's out-stretched tongue did not get past me.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
No comment.
EDIT:- Sorry, I thought it was obvious:- Maori haka Last edited by A. G. Maisey; 12th April 2010 at 11:40 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]()
Yes, the use of tongue is very extensive in maori culture
![]() Borneo: Last edited by Gustav; 13th April 2010 at 01:00 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]() Quote:
I think the 1st 2 pics are of a Tajong-like hilt produced by non-native carvers. So the motif cannot be considered accurate for Tajongs. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,220
|
![]()
Okay, just going to reel this in a bit and focus.
![]() I could be wrong, but i don't think that this is an American board depicting the great god the atom Enstein, nor is it from a Malay tajong design or the Maori of New Zealand. ![]() I am fairly sure it is indeed Dayak. I am also fairly sure that it should, to some extent at least, be possible to determine what tribe it is based on the actual design of the carving. I have seen some of our Dayak collectors tell tribal origin of mandaus based on the carving of the hilts so it seems to follow that design styles are specific to certain groups. I would also be very interested in understanding what the purpose of the basket this was attached to might have been. The one Gustav shows might provide some clues to this as it seems to be in a museum. Was there any descriptive labeling? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]()
No David, there wasn't. It is from de Young museum in San Francisco.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
David, this subject of Dyak tribe ID of ethnographic objects based upon carving style is something I know diddley squat about.
No way I could even attempt it. However, give me half a dozen or so mandaus and I will probably be able to ID tribe of origin. Why? Because Hornbill & Dragon and some other minor books I have, between them, give pretty comprehensive coverage of mandau and other weapon styles that are associated with the various tribes. To jump from that sort of ID to an ID based on stylistic variation might be asking just a wee bit too much. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,235
|
![]()
Hello David,
Pfew, at last one of the Borneo freaks steps in ![]() ![]() Following the recent threads on mandau hilts and the extensive knowledge of Arjan, I must say that I become very reluctant to put a name to tribes. I am not much of a reader, and presently I am at a stage where I feel the more I know, the less I know ![]() But this board gives me one first impression , and that is that it is not very traditional/old. It really looks like tourist style to me. Also the kind of wood is strange. Is it really black ? or is it made black with pigment ? is it heavy wood ? because heavy wood would not be handy for a back pack. Ps. here is my example. Bought it from the person who collected it approx 15 years ago. So definately not old, but well made, more according to the traditional motifs. But still you can see the carving is by far not as fine as when they made these in the past (say before WW2). Last edited by asomotif; 14th April 2010 at 01:17 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|