![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: switzerland
Posts: 298
|
![]()
many thanks for all the interesting contributions.
I personally think the blade to be older than early 20th century it is perfectly forged and balanced. gruss Chregu |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Hi All
I tend to think this piece is circa 1885-1900 the hilt is wood and could have been covered in brass that was possibly removed. As in past threads I believe we touched on a point where younger warriors started out with flyssa but yearned for a well made yataghan as more of a status weapon. The flyssa that we see here seems to be a cross between the two. It looks Tribally made and not of the finer workmanship seen on older pieces. Still it seems like a good piece to me worthy of being any collection. Remember not all young warriors from that time had money to spend on a higher class flyssa or yataghan and needed to go to the local village sword maker or an apprentice to purchase his weapon. ![]() Lew |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
Very astutely observed Lew
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|