![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Quote:
Gav |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 327
|
Interesting pic from a members website, from a sword that doesn't appear to have been worked on for sometime.
Last edited by Rick; 11th March 2010 at 11:51 PM. Reason: item for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
I respectfully suggest that the one shown in the link is much more recent .
Sorry for the edit Bill, but tis agin the rules to post items for sale in the discussion forums .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 327
|
Sorry didn't mean to break the rules. Didn't mean the original posting but the later example. I don't have a good knowledge of metals but trying to attach/adhere two different metals is tough.
A flimsy piece of metal won't stick to the steel blade. My first thought was later functionality. Appears there's something more. Perhaps it is just decoration, but I 'm somewhat leery of that. Talismanic? This is a great posting, in the sense of, restoration vs. preserving. I don't think the hilt represents the original sword & on the other hand, changing the wear, removes history/use. It is easy to see that many of these swords are being "updated". I'm guilty of repairing/replacing. Difference between nickel & silver is only $10/less in most cases of repairs. The original sword, in this posting deserves better dress & on the other hand, it should be preserved. Don't know right answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 58
|
[QUOTE=Bill]Sorry didn't mean to break the rules. Didn't mean the original posting but the later example. I don't have a good knowledge of metals but trying to attach/adhere two different metals is tough.
A flimsy piece of metal won't stick to the steel blade. My first thought was later functionality. Appears there's something more. Perhaps it is just decoration, but I 'm somewhat leery of that. Talismanic? Good point Bill, due to the traces of scrolled ingravings on some of this plates. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 338
|
Quote:
By the way, this also prompts me to ask another question: Which part of this work was Phillip's and which was the work of Charles? It is all very lovely! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
Quote:
I have it from a very reliable source that the "real" original handle would have been a small ivory kakatu and it would have had baca-baca. However, I think the original handle was replaced for what ever reason so long ago that it spent most of it's existance in the restored current state. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|