![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 171
|
![]()
I think you got a point there, Detlef.
Because of the norm, I've seen most bugis keris without its etching and on certain point, it is nice to see it like that. But if the pamor is traceable and outstanding, etching seems to be just fine, as in case of your palembang gonjo iras blade... ![]() Meanwhile in this case, perhaps do nothing is best ![]() It is a keris in a good state, but do it really have some ages? It doesn't look new, nor did it looks too old as well... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,278
|
![]()
I think that it's an old one, but very difficult to say only by pictures.
BTW, which material is the pendok? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 171
|
![]()
I think it is silver, since there are blacky patch all over it. I could be mamas as well, but I have very limited knowledge on identifying one.
I must have some age, but detlef how could you ID that? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 171
|
![]()
I just got some opinion regarding of this keris:
The hilt and wronko is Bugis. Sheath is Sumatran. Blade is Javanese, of dhapur Menderang, pamor Unthu Walang. Somebody of extensive knowledge of Javanese keris might can approve this theory or not. As my knowledge are limited, I wouldn't say it's a Javanese blade because it doesn't look like one. I might be extremely wrong, however.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|