![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
The lack of wear and the quality of the workmanship in the brass inlay suggest to me that this is of recent manufacture as well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 103
|
![]()
A good and complete tombak blade should have methuk, a cylindrical base that hold the blade so it will not get into the shaft's hole and break the shaft upon impact. It might be made separatly or not, like ganja in keris. The place where the blade meets methuk should fit the methuk well, that is, cylindrical in shape.
No methuk and it is slightly square on Devadatta blade. I think it is a reshaped old pieces, might be cut from a sword or other tombak, who knows ? Of course, my comment based on assumption that the blade really comes from Indonesia/Java. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,229
|
![]()
If not new then it is seriously reworked from an older blade. The kinatah is certainly new and as has been pointed out, there is very little edge wear so if it isn't new it has been reshaped. If i had to vote though i would say new.
Willem, take a look at the incredible details of the contempory work being done in Bali on Alan's thread on the keris form of the Neka Museum in Ubud. Craftmanship is far from dead in Indonesia. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,235
|
![]() Quote:
So, you are right, this quality carving can indeed be new. But what a pity that they than don't combine it with a new quality forged blade. Than it would be a contemporary piece of outstanding quality. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,048
|
![]()
Beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|