![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for the reply. I thought it looked like wootz but I couldn't identify the pattern or why it was so 'flowing' and even (if that makes any sense?) and began to wonder if I was just being hopeful. Edit: AH! 'sham' refers to the flowing semi straight pattern without any swirls etc! Yes, I looked through some old threads! ![]() Regards Gene Last edited by Atlantia; 29th January 2009 at 01:24 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
I tend to think that the surface patterning is due to layering, and as such it would be a form of pattern-weld. The effect, which reminds me of pamor or hada, appears to be too continuous to be the crystalline dendrites which are the characteristic of wootz. The eye can follow the lines in the pattern for a distance, whereas the visual impression given by wootz tends to be like flowing water: there is a current but the individual ripples aren't contiguous. Furthermore, in the two pics I see what look like pockets of black carbon which are oriented along the undulating lines. These look like the cold-shuts resulting from imperfect welds which sometimes occur in the production of a pattern-welded or folded-steel lamellar blade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
HI Phillip,
Thanks for coming in on this. I had a quick look for 'sham wootz' online last night and noticed some similar discussions about if 'sham' should really even be described as wootz, is that what we're seeing here, or do you think this shouldn't be categorised as sham and is 'just' a finely layered/folded steel? Regards Gene |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
I agree with RSWORD. This is typical sham pattern. Some still debate sham's attribution to wootz, but it has not been officially declared as non-wootz. The inferiority of sham comparing to other more prominent patterns is another topic, but generally speaking - sham wootz is still wootz
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Gene,
Based on everything I've seen of "sham", it' wootz. As you probably well know, the name "sham" in this case is a Near Eastern term, it doesn't mean "false" or "faux" as we would use it in English. Even if your blade is not wootz, it shouldn't be a cause of disappointment! There's nothing wrong with pattern welding, layering, lamination, and all that; as we all know a number of cultures East and West did some remarkable things with it and the craft is pursued at a high level even today. Wootz is indeed a marvellous thing (when it's done right, and frankly said there's more indifferent to bad stuff out there than there is the really excellent), but we should not elevate it to the status of a sacred cow. Even in this, the Year of the Ox! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
Alex and Philip,
Thankyou for continuing this discussion. I think I should add a picture of the entire piece, so that you can see why I was suprised to notice the layering. I've had this knife for a long long time and have only recently 're-found' it. I asked a question about its identity a while ago and was pleased to find out that these Indian/Nepalese hunting type knives do have a following. I did not however expect that the balde would be anything other than plain steel. Imagine my suprise? ![]() ![]() ![]() Philip. Absolutely, I'm happy whatever it is. I am just happy its not a land-rover leaf spring! ![]() I am still smiling at the unexpected bonus of having this interesting new aspect to something I'd taken for granted for so many years. Gene P.S.some decent daylight here would be nice to get some better pictures! ![]() Last edited by Atlantia; 31st January 2009 at 12:56 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
I'm really suprised this hasn't engendered more discussion.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
I forwarded this discussion page to smith Ric Furrer, who lives in Wisconsin and is one of the few in his trade to have mastered the art of making wootz, and he also thinks tthat this blade is something else. Hopefully he'll be posting on this thread soon with an explanation.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|