![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
That's one good looking sword, Robert
![]() Would that be the tang protruding on the hilt's butt end? If that would be the case, then perhaps that would mean that the sword is from Luzon, like Pampanga as what Battara mentioned. The other possibility I guess is that it is from Batangas. Both provinces are just about 100 km (60 miles) from Manila -- the former is to the north, while the latter is to the south. At the recent Macao exhibit, there's a similar sword [pic below] described as: 212. Luzon Tabak Period : Post 1900, Katipunan Era Hilt : Carved carabao horn in the shape of a human figural head with hat/cap. Hilt with octagonal brass ferrule and cap with peened tang construction. Blade : Long clipped tipped blade. Typical blade shape used by Katipuneros. Scabbard : Not available Origin : Southern Luzon, Batangas Overall Length : 65.2 cm [25.7"] Blade Length : 50.2 cm [19.8"] Handle Length : 15 cm [5.9"] Scabbard Length : No Scabbard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
Yes, I remember that one. I'm not sure I agree with Batangas though.
Any way, yes the Spanish did forbid points on the blade. Also a good point Migueldiaz (every pun intended ![]() As far as talibon are concerned, they come from Cebu and that is farther away from the centrally controlled regions around Manila like Batangas, Pampanga, etc. Cebu is farther away from Spanish control and so is Ilocos for that matter (another source of pointed daggers). This is my thinking anyway. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Last edited by migueldiaz; 21st December 2008 at 12:09 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
You sure are a punny guy!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by migueldiaz; 22nd December 2008 at 04:50 PM. Reason: ... to refine the points! ;) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
Oh no, you are doing just fine..
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
ok-ir!
![]() edit: i think it's smarter to write it this way => ok!-r ![]() Last edited by migueldiaz; 24th December 2008 at 04:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|