![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
Hi Broadaxe,
thank you ...yes I did notice one of the labels stating 'paire epees du duel ' but because of the cup hilt, longer handle etc. I did not think it was necessarily applicable to mine. I had wondered whether Duelling rapiers may be partly catergorised by the cup hilt etc ( mentioned above ) ...now I know that it is not necessarily so.Hi William, thank you for your time in trying to ID the blade marks...very kind of you . There is very little regarding fencing during the 18th C / 19th C on the web, in English anyway. I might start 'googling' ('McDougalling' Hi Jim ) using French and or German ... (I can see Babelfish getting a lot of use soon )The tang of the blade appears to be 'peened' over......whether the pommel is threaded and the tang peened to secure it (prevent it turning) is unclear. What is clear is the fact that pommel and tang were 'mated' sometime ago .All the fittings are nice and tight so it is impossible to gain any more information.....without damage that is The steel in the 'pommel' picture is in fact quite dark with stablised rust, lighting gives the appearance of newer metal.Kind Regards David . |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
Fernando |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
everything to keep me occupied from working is welcomed The pommel looks like the blade is not threaded. This would indicate that the weapon is authentic. So we must get back to Broadaxe' first guess about it being a private ordered weapon. Perhaps the personal whims of a fencer were taken into account while designing the weapon. The POB and the strange grip would indicate something like that. Regarding the blade... I got something, but I want to verify it first... this might take some time. Regarding the sharp point: I wouldn't be too sure that it was in fact used as a duelling weapon. It was not unheard of the sharpening of foils, but the chances are quite slim to get one nowadays which has survived the tides of time. So statistically: it must be sharpened later William |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 685
|
Hi William.
Quote:
Cheers Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
@ Chris:
I'm getting goosebumps thinking of some "professional" sharpening an old weapon... ... kind of raping....Having two older beauties which were ground down to get a sharp point, my heart is breaking every time I see them One is a "training weapon" for duels with a Klingenthal blade (around 1895), with the guard of o duelling weapon which used to have a flattened tip. Nevertheless a wonderful piece, but... not original any more... The sharping was done quite professional, I just found out when I checked the length of the weapon and compared it with other weapons. I've attached two pics. Coming back to the foil: perhaps the grooves on the grip were made to provide a grip for some kind of leather-wire binding this would keep the wire in it's place. All the best William |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 685
|
Hi William,
A very beautiful foil - Thanks for sharing. Cheers Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 334
|
Beautiful indeed -
yet not a foil, but an epee, note the tri-blade. This is the main duelling weapon of the 19th century, along with the single shot pistol. The shallow hollow indicates an early blade (without a milled groove), the hilt combination suggests an age of 1860-1880's. I used to have a similar epee with a knight's head pommel but of iron rather brass, with a decorated steel dish guard, circa 1900. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|