![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
There were no further comments because of "kampilan fatigue" perhaps? ![]() Actually when those museum pics were first posted in PI Weaponry in Spanish Museums, forumites already commented that some items are misplaced (e.g., Battara's comment on African weapons being there). And I've also been leafing through the old threads on kampilan in the archives and indeed, the kampilan discussions go a long way back. So perhaps some are not that interested anymore in reciting the same old stuff! ![]() But me, I'm not tired yet because I've just started ![]() Best regards to all. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Tim,
I agree with you that there is a risk of misinformation if you only use one museum, one book or whatever as the only source of information. But if you combine it with other sources it's possible to discover the misinformation and find out which information that's credible. Isn't the above mentioned procedure rather basic for all of us? Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
Indeed the process is like that of "triangulation" in locating a radio transmission, using several detectors that are located differently. Each detector being imperfect will have its own margin of error. But when you combine the results of several detectors, the error of one will be lopped off by the other/s. And the result you'll get will be much closer to reality. Also museum curators are jacks of all trades but masters of none. And this is understandable given the huge amount of items of all kind in their inventory ... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|