![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
No Scratch, not cengkrong, pasopati.
Why do you mention Frey's book? Which edition? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
|
![]()
Pasopati,a lovely shape, Are modern made keris of this type availiable to collectors?
I am having trouble finding info on cengkrong, direction please? A G maisey, "The Kris, Edward Frey, second edition" mentions a warangan method, is what I should have wrote. Does Freys method produce reliable results? Is this an acceptable change? I hope to succeed in staining the blade with time. Cheers, Dan ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
Yes, it is possible to find current era blades of dhapur pasopati, however, they will not look like the one I made, as this is my interpretation. They will have the same overall appearance, and they will have the same features, but they will look different. Its the same with any art:- ask 20 artists to draw a tree, and each of those trees will be different.
I've got a cengkrong around somewhere, when I find it I'll post a pic. The method published by Frey is in one of the later editions of his book. I do not know what he published, so I cannot comment. The level of colour you have achieved is sufficient to read the pamor, so its OK. Not yet good, but OK. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
Two pics of cengkrongs.
The physical keris was made by Empu Pauzan Pusposudgo in 1983 and the foto of a certificate accompanies it. It should be noted that although Pak Pauzan is commonly referred to as "empu", he himself rejects this title, and prefers to be known as a pandai keris. This was the ninth keris made by Pak Pauzan. The foto of the drawing is from a guidebook of keris dhapur. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|