![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 551
|
![]()
Hi All,
Hopefully my comment isn't so far off base as to have me compared to a recent "contributor" to the forum but after seeing the other photos on the AlamShah website, the tang still looks further toward the dagu side of the keris than is normal. If that is the case then, given the quality of the blade, I have to imagine the empu knew exactly what he was doing and the offset was deliberate. What then was the reason for that positioning? Sincerely, RobT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Some keris have a pesi much more prominently based off-center than this example. I have no pics at hand but those I can remember from the top of my head were a few sepokal blades and a variant keris panjang.
I'd need to handle such a keris to assess the function. Maybe with the curved sepokal blades it doesn't make that much of a difference, anyway? ![]() Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|