![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
It does not have a Sudanese feel the kotkagari does look indian to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
I think its most likely second half 19thC. There are a lot of modern good items around but this one looks ok to me. I'd worry about a lack of deeper oxidisation in the recesses between the blades and shaft loop, but Valjhun has seen it pre-clean, so would have suspicions if it had looked newly aged or dirtied up.
I think if it was 'new' it would have an ornate handle to go with it. If it was recent it would be lighter or unsharpened. I'd have a punt at it at the right price. I think its either old enough or nice enough to merit a place in my collection. I like the plain wooden shaft. Heres a similar shaped head in the V&A
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9
|
I posted a single sided axe head in april the design on the blade is the same I think
Thommo(amateur) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
I really like the Bhuj and flanged mace in that diagram as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
nice bhiuj
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
Thanks jthommo! Yes, identical kofgatri!
Well, I've aquired that from an old attic here nerby, hmmm, is it really possible that the thing is turkish? I can't believe that, but... |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|