![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Bill
That is an interesting kris. Seems like the base comes from a broken Sumatran panjang keris with this top part of the blade being that of a European blade? Lew |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,018
|
![]()
I saw this Kris last month. It's a beauty. The seller thought it was Moro. It looked Indo/Malaysian to me. Congrats on a good acquisition.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 132
|
![]()
Congratulation for having one very rare keris. Very strong peninsular Malaysia influence. As VVV mentioned, it has a close resemblance of Sumatran keris panjang/anak alang or bahari at the sosoran and greneng (base) and no kembang kacang. Could it suggest a 'kapit' blade ??? fusing 2 pieces of blade metal??? Very interesting.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]()
Thanks for the compliments!
I wonder about the hole through the blade? Just below the VOC. Could this be the hilt of the original blade where a rivet or some attachment pin came though? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]() Quote:
I'm afraid the hole may have been drilled into the blade for mounting and display purposes ![]() Still a very nice kris Congrats. Lew |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]()
Lew,
This is certainly a possibility and I have seen pieces with holes made for hanging the piece on a wall. However I am curious about the possibility of it being a rivet hole. I am not familiar with VOC blades, so I would like to pose a few questions for those people who have studied them. How far from the VOC marking is the hilt, usually? Is it near the hilt or further up the blade? In some swords, like kaskaras, the markings (crescents) are a distance from the handle. Most others have them near the handle. This is why I am suggesting that the blade and tang could a major part of the blade we see here. Why are there numbers and a difference in the blade showing a fuller-like depression below the hole? This could also indicate the numbered part with the "fuller-like depression is part of the original tang, enclosed by a handle, and is now part of the blade. No big deal either way. I am just curious. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,235
|
![]()
Congrats Bill !
These pictures are better than the ones you had before. Also nice to see the size next to a normal sized Moro keris. The makers of this keris picked only a very small piece of a VOC blade. VOC swords where not very big/heavy but certainly bigger that what remains within this hybrid keris. Normally VOC markings are not placed under the tang. So This hole is not a original hole for attaching the hilt. By the way, this reminds me of a thread by Antonio Cejunior, where he introduced a contemperary Moro / Tanto hybrid knife. Some forumites where pretty nasty on his creation. ![]() ![]() In this case the maker of this odd Sumatra / Moro / VOC mix is not amongst us. That must be the reason of absent criticism. not ? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|