![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
|
![]()
Hi Jim and Chris,
I measured a some of my sabers a couple years ago and got these numbers: M1840 Total length 41.75" Blade length 36" Width of blade at Hilt 1.25" M1860 Total length 41" Blade length 35.25" Width of blade at Hilt 1" M1872 Total length 37.5" Blade length 32" Width of blade at Hilt .75" Unfortunately they are not accessable now for weighing. John Thillman in Civil War Cavalry & Artillery Sabers on Page 23 gives the typical length for a M1860 blade as 34 1/2 to 35 inches. I think the example you had might be a little short. I will see if I can find some references to weights later tonight. All the Best Jeff Last edited by Jeff D; 8th April 2008 at 04:21 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
|
![]()
Hi All,
I was able to find the Regulations of 1861: For the light Cavalry saber the weights are as follows. Weight of the sword or saber complete (Saber and scabbard) = 3 lb. 7 oz. Weight of finished blade= 1 lb. 6 oz. Weight of scabbard= 1 lb 4 oz. It appear that Mr Frost was using the finished blade weight from the regulations rather than the total saber weight which is around 2 lbs as Chris noticed (the alternate is that he was using the weight of a M1872 which would be close to his weight but not used by anyone). In any event his numbers would appear wrong, an excellent observation. Back to the original topic, I wonder how Butterfield and Butterfield linked the Roby saber to the General rather than his civilian nephew (also killed at Little Big Horn)? I wonder if it would have fetched $32,000? All the Best Jeff |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|