|
|
|
11th December 2007, 03:50 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
Hi All,
havent you guys noticed that at the blade's CP, there is no serration?! |
|
|
|
11th December 2007, 07:39 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
13th December 2007, 10:16 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
13th December 2007, 02:57 PM
|
#4 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
Hi S.Al-Anizi
Nice to see you again The tulwar in question seems to have had the serrations added as an after thought.Lew |
|
|
|
|
15th December 2007, 07:36 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
16th December 2007, 04:35 AM
|
#6 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
S.Al-Anizi, it is indeed good to see you again, and very astute that you noticed the section of blade non-serrated. I saw another tulwar with the standard disc pommel hilt mounted with this type of blade, serrated in exactly the same manner with the section unserrated in the same place. Seems to have been an affectation at least somewhat regularly used.
All best regards, Jim |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
