My first Dha ....a few questions please

Mark · 20th November 2007, 11:41 PM

That is a tad on the long side. A 2.5-3 inch tang would be more typical. I don't have very many dha with a handle loose enough to remove, so I think I will try the magnet test. Clever idea. Ian once posted a series of blade:tang ratios, but I don't have the link. I'll add it here if I can find it.

katana · 21st November 2007, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark

That is a tad on the long side. A 2.5-3 inch tang would be more typical.

I hope this doesn't start a new male 'condition' ......tang envy

katana · 24th November 2007, 12:26 AM

After doing a little research ....a tang of approx. 3" seems fairly typical for a blade of around 20".

I had considered the possibillity that my blade had been shortened (hence the 4.5" tang) but the distal taper would be wrong. Seeing that the brass 'dots' seem to be placed very near the tip (on other examples shown) .....also suggests that this is no 'cut down'.

Personally I prefer the idea of a longer tang .... perhaps the forger of this blade had the same sentiments. From a practical point of view, it may make it more robust and less likely to break (part company with the handle). Is it possible that this blade had a specific use which required a stronger bond between blade and hilt.

20th November 2007, 11:41 PM	#1
Mark Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 987	That is a tad on the long side. A 2.5-3 inch tang would be more typical. I don't have very many dha with a handle loose enough to remove, so I think I will try the magnet test. Clever idea. Ian once posted a series of blade:tang ratios, but I don't have the link. I'll add it here if I can find it.

24th November 2007, 12:26 AM	#3
katana Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Kent Posts: 2,658	After doing a little research ....a tang of approx. 3" seems fairly typical for a blade of around 20". I had considered the possibillity that my blade had been shortened (hence the 4.5" tang) but the distal taper would be wrong. Seeing that the brass 'dots' seem to be placed very near the tip (on other examples shown) .....also suggests that this is no 'cut down'. Personally I prefer the idea of a longer tang .... perhaps the forger of this blade had the same sentiments. From a practical point of view, it may make it more robust and less likely to break (part company with the handle). Is it possible that this blade had a specific use which required a stronger bond between blade and hilt.