![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Cincinnati, OH 
				
				
					Posts: 940
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi Jacob, welcome to the forum. Nice Bali keris. Authentic? Certainly. Looks to me to be mid -late 19thC, but it could be a bit older. Nice silver diety hilt. Most of the stones look real on there, including low-grade ruby and sapphire, and some other semi-precious stones. The mendak (hilt ring) looks like a newer addition and the "stones" there may be glass. The metal here is probably brass.The metal sheath cover appears to also be silver and is nicely repoussed. Nice blade as well. It could use a etch and restaining to raise the pamor pattern. All in all pretty nice. I certainly wouldn't mind owning it.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2005 
				Location: Austin, TX 
				
				
					Posts: 14
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks, Nechesh. This is the nicest one I have. Here is another one. I'm a little suspicious about this one, as the blade looks too new and perfect.
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Cincinnati, OH 
				
				
					Posts: 940
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Jacob, i would say that this second one is newer than the first, but it is not a new blade. Could be early 20thC up until the 1940s, but i doubt any newer than that. This quality of keris doesn't really appear in post WWII Bali. Could you show a close-up of the gandik area (where the carved elephant head is)? The hilt on this one is also nice, but not like the first. I suspect this one may be silver plated brass as opposed to solid silver.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2005 
				Location: Austin, TX 
				
				
					Posts: 14
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The hilt did not come with the keis. It had a relly crude wood one.
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Louisville, KY 
				
				
					Posts: 7,345
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I would say with David that silver plated brass is involved.  Both keris hilts look silver plated brass or white brass to me and newer.  Nice work.  The sheath of the first might very well be silver.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2005 
				Location: Austin, TX 
				
				
					Posts: 14
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Both hilts do have greenish (like corroded copper) residue in recesses, more visible on the second. Does  it mean they are both modern repros?  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			There is a balinese keris offered on e-bay right now: (deleted , active auction) The hilt looks like a combination Cecanginan and Gerantiman. Is it modern also? Last edited by Rick; 6th March 2005 at 06:17 PM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: Singapore 
				
				
					Posts: 1,248
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Whoa! Jacob...forum rules, no posting of active auction item... 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	  .
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |