![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Jim, Jens and CourseEight,
when researching this type of sword I found a reference to several 'unusual' serrated bladed swords being used in battle end of 17c early 18th. The prime function of these 'prototype (?)' swords was to cut armour....however, the soldiers did not like them and they were soon made redundant and discarded. The reference was via a Google search and I have lost the link ![]() However, the hilt does look possible for late 17c/early 18c ....could be one of those 'discarded'......... ![]() ![]() Jens with the long spike pommel this sword may not have been too badly balanced .....if used two handed. It almost seems to be a cross between a sword and a 'hilted' mace. Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,459
|
![]()
Hi David,
Thank you for that reference which it seems I have seen as well ( I think it may be in Pant.....Jens? help ![]() I think the biggest problem with the blade on this is not as much the serration as the extremely counterproductive curvature of the blade. Also, it seems unclear on the semantics of 'armour', which if mail or steel would be ridiculous to expect being cut by a blade. If the 'armour' was of the heavy textile type, more plausible maybe. All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
Just going on its visual appearence but it looks impractical & poorly balanced to me.
Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|