![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
A comment on the piece that started this thread :
What an interesting wootz pattern , I cant get over how 'loose' it is .. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
Nice acquisition Guy!
I completely agree with Central Asian attribution, and Ariels notes. This is likely Uzbek from regions closer to now Afghanistan. The most applicable term would probably be 'bytshak' which is spelled various ways. See article "Some Nineteenth Century Arms from Bukhara" by Torben Flindt (in "Islamic Arms & Armour" ed. Robert Elgood, pp.20-29). Rick's note pointing out the pesh kabz in Buttin brings attention to the interesting recurve on the blade which seems atypical in the bytshak. This same recurve is also found on N. Indian khanjars. The interesting chiseling and choil type work on the back of the blade at the terminus of the back edge is also Central Asian characteristic. The cleft pommel is well known on many Central Asian edged weapons and is seen on examples of Uzbek and Afghan shashkas. Best regards, Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
quote "The cleft pommel is well known on many Central Asian edged weapons and is seen on examples of Uzbek and Afghan shashkas.
Best regards, Jim" AAAAhhh, I see, thats great, I learn more evry time I visit here. Spiral |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
Spiral,
Me too!!! Best regards, Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
|
Quote:
I agree with Rick, this is a very strange wootz pattern?? Could this be Arab Damascus? Jeff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 18
|
And I learn more than any of you! This is great! Thanks for all the input.
I've attached another picture of the handle, the cleft is quite deep. The wootz is very pleasent I must say, sort of 'watery'. That's certainly what decided me into buying it. I've attached another picture of the pattern for you enjoyment :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
Guy , I'd love to see a close up of that blade taken in natural light .
It is a most fascinating wootz pattern . |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
Yes , I agree , it's hard to get no light reflection at all .
Cloudy bright days are best for this lighting . Photoshop or Irfanview could help manipulate the picture to accentuate the patterning .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
I have a friend from Uzbekistan and he told me that such a knife is called Pichok.
The similarity with the Turkish name Bichaq is obvious and perfectly understandable: Uzbeks are descended from Turkic-Mongol tribes and share the same ethnic roots with the "traditional" Turks. They have adopted their name in honor of one of the Altyn Orda Khans, Ozbek. By the way, this is a very popular boy's name in modern Turkey. Tajiks are native Central Asians and are close to Persians. They are still smarting from the devastation inflicted upon them by the Mongols and view Uzbeks as "intruders"; when talking to a Tajik, do NOT call him Uzbek! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Anyway, here's the new lot. It's hard to get a picture of the whole blade with the wootz patterns coming out decently, but for the real fans, I've reverted to plan B: high def scanner. The result is not bad at all, if a little bright (but this can be mended with Photoshop), however, the 1200 dpi scan is a whoping 20Mb, so if someone's got a place for storing this file on a server, I'd be happy to upload it there, this forum's site won't take it. I hope the new pictures will give you a better idea of this very nice wootz pattern. Personally, I could not find any 'structure' to it, no ladder or anything like that, just a stream of flowing water. Anyone's got an idea of the age of the piece? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|