![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2005 
				Location: Australia 
				
				
					Posts: 685
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi Ian, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I chose my words carefully when I said that "That is not a facon, at least in the nowadays regionally and commonly accepted sense of the word" Facon simply means a large knife and all kinds of large and small knives found their way into the hands of Gauchos. Those silver hilted and ornate knives that these days are associated with them are very much a mid to late 19th century phenomena. As well, only the wealthy could afford them - Station owners, their overseers and the like. As you can see it is not possible to say exactly what is a facon, especially what was a facon in the old days. According to some, any knife tucked into the belt of a Gaucho is a facon. However, authorities like Domenech and the late Osornio did make an attempt to standardize the terminology, though Domenech acknowledges that there is always something or another that escapes his definitions. If you care to, you may wish to drop a line to Abel Domenech and find out first hand. He speaks fluent English and has a website (down as I write this, but do a Google later) Be all that as it may, it is certainly a very handsome piece. Cheers Chris  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Vikingsword Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: The Aussie Bush 
				
				
					Posts: 4,522
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks Chris. I will drop the honorable gentleman a note after I get the knife. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Ian.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 62
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It was pointed out that the top one does not have a guard.  I presume that would mean that the top knife is more likely to be ceremonial than as a knife used for fighting or dueling.  Especially as it was purpose made.  A decent "purpose made" fighting dagger would have a guard I presume (like the Bowie).  Surely if "you" didn't have a guard but were going up against someone with a similar knife but with a guard then this would place "you" at a disadvantage.    
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Feb 2005 
				Location: Centerville, Kansas 
				
				
					Posts: 2,196
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Here is a dagger that I have had for a while now but was never quite sure where it was from. At first I thought it was from the Philippines but I'm really not sure anymore. Maybe the experts can say for sure. It is approximently 17 and 1/4" long total. 12-3/4" blade and a 4-3/4" Hilt. It is flat on one side and tapered on the other. It has a crosswork design on the Blades taper side.The Hilt and pommel are Brass and wood in an octagon configuration with some design work on the guard. It has a sheepskin or goatskin sewn sheath which has shrunk with age but it still fits on the blade.
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |