![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
well, I thought that it is XVIIIth century, possibly even the first half (based on locks). But then I saw the signature (displayed above) on the locks which I think quite certainly testifies to the end of XIXth century.
Last edited by Rivkin; 6th October 2006 at 07:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 420
|
So, they are not Miquelet locks after all?
Marcus |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
Definitely miquelet.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|