![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Thanks Rick, very resembling in style.
What does Frey say about it? Let's look closer at the blade also. Anybody who dares to stick out their neck on this? Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
Hi Michael ,
Frey , of course says nothing about it ; absolutely nothing ! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,220
|
![]()
Well, i could stick my neck out Michael, but it wouldn't really mean much since i don't really know very much.
![]() I will say that the mendak appears to be an old (not too old, but certainly not new) lung wideng type which i believe (at least according to Solyom) would be a Surakarta form. I am not sure if such a mendak could be properly used on a Madurese keris. The hilt, of course, is not Surakarta, and since Naga Sasra believes that this blade was adapted to this sheath it would seem we have a bit of a mix 'n' match here. The blade looks more Javanese than Madurese to me, but i don't really have anything to back that up with, just a gut instinct. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|