![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]() Quote:
Maybe some polishing and staining might give more information how this blade was forged and tempered? Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Alam Shah; 12th August 2006 at 04:37 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
Does anyone see a similarity in the 'air tangan' of this keris blade with VVV's panjang up for discussion? Look at the sor-soran area of both kerises, and ignore the atypical greneng and the "bump" on the gandik on this piece. Very similar isn't it.
![]() And look at this blade from Aji's collection: http://www.kampungnet.com.sg/modules...view_photo.php The dress was commissioned in Malaysia, but the blade was definitely sourced from Riau, which could be a stepping board for kerises from Central or Northern Sumatra. So, could we be looking at a Minang origin for VVV's panjang? On the greneng - I've never seen anything like this before... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,048
|
![]()
I cannot offer any opinion on origin of this blade. I only know it is not Javanese or Balinese.
However, regarding the similarity of the sculpting in the sorsoran of Bluerf`s picture, and Alam Shah`s picture, I can comment. I`m sorry, but I can see no similarity at all between the two. The major disparity is that in Alam Shah`s piece the blumbangan is boto adeg, in Bluerf`s it is boto rubu, but apart from that the actual execution of each blade is almost at opposite poles. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|