![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 189
|
![]()
Yes, that blade had 2 patterned pieces of 50% meteorite material sandwitching a piece w/o meteorite. The light layers are pretty much all E.T., and the main thing I noticed while making the blade was how easily Campo Del Cielo forges together, compared to other irons.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'effects on layering,' though, can you be more specific? If meteoric nickel was all they had to bring out high contrast in the old blades, I bet the ET metal is not very diluted - in the light layers of the pamor. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]()
You are absolutely correct nechesh... my fault for being focused on the meteorite/nickel iron subject, dealing with the knife that Jeff made. My Pajajaran is nickel "free" and made of contrasting iron alloys. Thanks for keeping me honest.
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
The most common method of making pamor with nickel is to take a paper thin piece of nickel, sandwich it between two layers of iron and forge weld it. You take four of these little billets and weld them together, then you forge out and double over and weld until you have 128 nominal layers of nickel.
In the finished pamor the nickel layers are quite distinct. The nickel does not melt into the iron, it stays as distinct layers of material. Probably the easiest way to think of the mix of nickel and iron, is that the iron acts as "glue" to hold the layers of nickel together.Accordingly, if you can find a relatively wide band of nickel, you have a pretty large area that could be tested. I`m sorry, I cannot expand further on Prof Jerzy Piaskowski's work. It is highly technical, and his two largest papers have not yet been published. I am only aware of the content because I have worked with him advising on strictly keris and cultural matters, since about 1988. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]()
I understand Alan, and I have not read Prof Piaskowski's work.
![]() My question is regarding the iron-nickel alloys in the meteorite material (my apology for not beening clear). In Iron Meteorites, there are two major alloys of iron-nickel: Kamacite: a solid solution of around 7.5% nickel. Taenite: a solid solution of more than 25 percent nickel. There are also the possibilities of having Iron Carbides - solid solutions of Fe, Ni & Co with Carbon, such as Cohenite and Haxonite. But let us ignore those for the moment. If I recall, iron and nickel are always alloyed together unless in oxide or silicate form – in meteorites. My question was, what happens to these concentrations of iron-nickel on forging and folding? Do they leave a pattern that would be pamor like? Or do they simply mix and are indistinguishable (in the iron and meteorite mix- if you were to make a blade from this material alone)? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|