![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 286
|
I originally viewed this sword as part of the Pitt Collection in the possession of the South Australian Museum at the time. This was on the 4th of August 2004, according to the pictures I took then. Recently the museum had made the decision to destroy the collection, however someone suggested they send it to an interstate auction house instead. No one in South Australia was alerted to this decision. Thankfully eventually the word got out, and I was able to secure this sword at auction.
I have never seen a guard like it and was hoping someone out there might have encounterd a similar example. It has GR and the British Coat of arms on the blade, sadly very faint now. Cheers Cathey |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: In the wee woods north of Napanee Ontario
Posts: 433
|
That's a wonderful hilt. You would assume the original owner would have his portrait painted showing this sword?
What do you mean regarding a museum destroying a collection? Have people gone mad? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 286
|
Hi Will, yes in Australian museums have gone quiet mad. They will not exhibit anything that is not aboriginal despite the fact that we are supposedly a multicultural nation made up the descendents of immigrants from all over the world.
What is even more infuriating is that the museum in question invited the Heritage arms society to view the collection in 2004, yet when they were considering destroying it, didn’t even bother to contact the society. Cheers Cathey |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,438
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,334
|
Ignorance, Stupity, & Manipulation ........
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,740
|
I don't know why this museum initially chose to destroy rather than sell off their "foreign" arms collection. However, Australian regulators and politicians are willing to go to extraordinary lengths to restrict ownership of any form of weapon by its citizens. There is a belief that tight control of ownership of weapons will restrict violent acts.
Unfortunately, violence plays out anyway. The most recent efforts to limit ownership of weapons has been a poorly crafted law in the State if Victoria that prohibits ownership of "machetes" unless one has a permit for such a weapon. The legal definition of a machete is so broad that it encompasses any large knife made at any time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 138
|
I couldn't agree more. I recently imported two British c1840 percussion single shot pistols. To my dismay the import permits I had from the Victorian Police was useless due to a new importation of hanguns law since 'Bondi'. Now a Home Affairs Firearms Import Permit is required - the only snag is that they have no pathway for antique hanguns in place yet, so playing the waiting game there. In this case they have sidelined a perfectly functional system and replaced it with a dysfunctional system.
I don't know why this museum initially chose to destroy rather than sell off their "foreign" arms collection. It was due to their storage space being reduced and some things had to go, however that they could have even considered such destruction beggars belief and thank goodness that did not occur. I gather that other museum/s were given a chance to select important items prior to the remainder being sold by auction and so some items remain in public collections, where they are unlikely to ever be on display anyway...... |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|