Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 27th June 2026, 05:07 PM   #13
RobT
Member
 
RobT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 649
Default Two Additional Points

Dave F,

There are two additional points I didn’t mention in my first post. First, if your item is a just a sword and not a sword stick, why doesn’t it show any evidence of having had a means of suspension? I know that daisho were worn thrust through the obi but the sheaths had a knob to prevent the swords from sliding out. I don’t know of a similar form of sash carry in Africa. Secondly, if your blade wasn’t meant to be a sword stick, why is it so slender for its length and why is the OAL of the piece so coincidentally correct for a sword stick.
The absence of a ferrule is immaterial. As I pointed out in my first post, canes and sticks in Europe were oftentimes not meant for support and were simply carried as a status symbol. I should point out that this is the case with clubs in Africa. Rungu are too short to be used for support and even iwisa which are often long enough to be used as a stick, don’t have ferrules (and the four examples I have don’t show the type of wear at the tip that constant contact with the ground would cause).

Sincerely,
RobT
RobT is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.