![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 444
|
Yes, it's a blade from the maker himself. The sword's hilt dates from the mid-16th century, as does the shape and type of the blade. The other symbols in the blade's fullers all date from around 1540-1550.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 730
|
As I said before - but now even more so: a thing of wonder!
Thanks Dirk. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2025
Posts: 4
|
This is a beautiful sword in wonderful condition. What a piece to own. Thank you for the close-up photos of the developed guard and pommel. Could you perhaps provide some dimensions for the sword: overall length, blade length, width at Ricasso?
-A. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 296
|
Sorry ... I have been wool gathering ...
3lb 8oz Length o/a = 47" Blade=38.25" Cross guard= 10" Grip = 6" I noted that the Christie's description description describes it as "composite". I see not evidence of that. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 980
|
I well remember my anticipation of the glossy sales catalogues from the major London auctions back when I was active...
The cataloging was pretty stringent back then... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 296
|
Thats it. I wonder what the issue was?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 980
|
I wonder if some features seemed possibly asynchronous to the cataloger at the time, then logic was to better call it composite to be on the safe side if someone later had doubts. When and if it turns out to all be contemporaneous on further study, then the buyer will not likely be unhappy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 296
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|