Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st July 2025, 08:40 AM   #1
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
Default

Alan, thank you very much for your detailed response.

Regarding the "Kekandikan" from #6 - it seems to be a form from the island if Java, and could share a common ancestor with Balinese Kekandikan. I never was completely sure if that form is from Sunda or East Java. Perhaps and most likely both.

I have one specimen, which is pre-1850 and
could be pre-1800. The Gandar is tapering and fluted, Kruwingan going almost until the tip. There is a name Salempang being attached to this sheath form in West Java, but I have no possibilities to check it. There can be found a name for everything, of course. Hilt is unusual too, a similar hilt is depicted in a photo of Raden Adipati Aria Wiranotokusumo.

Related sheath forms we encounter also in Central Java.
Attached Images
    
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2025, 09:51 AM   #2
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
Default

Gustav, I do not know a Javanese wrongko form that has the same or similar form to a Balinese kekandikan.

This is not to say that such a Javanese wrongko form has never existed, it is to say that I do not know of it, & have never seen any Javanese wrongko that is able to be classified as "kekandikan" using Balinese standards.

The kekandikan in post #6 would be classified as kekandikan in Bali, & I cannot see anything in the complete keris dress to indicate a Javanese origin.


The complete keris that you have shown in post #11 looks to be a mixture of component parts, I cannot relate it to any other keris I remember having seen.

Is it possible to detect a location of origin for the blade of the post #11 keris?

Last edited by A. G. Maisey; 1st July 2025 at 02:40 PM. Reason: correction
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2025, 10:12 AM   #3
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
Default

Alan, yes, it differs from Balinese Kekandikan for sure, as differ the Central Javanese forms. But I am absolutely positive, that the sheath form shown in #6, which you called a Kekandikan, is of the same form as the one in #11.
My specimen as a whole was in Europe before 1850. The sheath parts belong together, and the sheath is original ensemble with the blade, which has sunken in a bit. It came together with the hilt, which has the same amount of patina, and likely is from the same region.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Gustav; 1st July 2025 at 11:33 AM.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2025, 10:21 AM   #4
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
Default

The blade has some Pamor Akhodiat.

And an interesting detail of hilt - it is triangular, the top pentagonal.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Gustav; 1st July 2025 at 11:46 AM.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.