![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
Alan, thank you very much for your detailed response.
Regarding the "Kekandikan" from #6 - it seems to be a form from the island if Java, and could share a common ancestor with Balinese Kekandikan. I never was completely sure if that form is from Sunda or East Java. Perhaps and most likely both. I have one specimen, which is pre-1850 and could be pre-1800. The Gandar is tapering and fluted, Kruwingan going almost until the tip. There is a name Salempang being attached to this sheath form in West Java, but I have no possibilities to check it. There can be found a name for everything, of course. Hilt is unusual too, a similar hilt is depicted in a photo of Raden Adipati Aria Wiranotokusumo. Related sheath forms we encounter also in Central Java. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
Gustav, I do not know a Javanese wrongko form that has the same or similar form to a Balinese kekandikan.
This is not to say that such a Javanese wrongko form has never existed, it is to say that I do not know of it, & have never seen any Javanese wrongko that is able to be classified as "kekandikan" using Balinese standards. The kekandikan in post #6 would be classified as kekandikan in Bali, & I cannot see anything in the complete keris dress to indicate a Javanese origin. The complete keris that you have shown in post #11 looks to be a mixture of component parts, I cannot relate it to any other keris I remember having seen. Is it possible to detect a location of origin for the blade of the post #11 keris? Last edited by A. G. Maisey; 1st July 2025 at 02:40 PM. Reason: correction |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
Alan, yes, it differs from Balinese Kekandikan for sure, as differ the Central Javanese forms. But I am absolutely positive, that the sheath form shown in #6, which you called a Kekandikan, is of the same form as the one in #11.
My specimen as a whole was in Europe before 1850. The sheath parts belong together, and the sheath is original ensemble with the blade, which has sunken in a bit. It came together with the hilt, which has the same amount of patina, and likely is from the same region. Last edited by Gustav; 1st July 2025 at 11:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
The blade has some Pamor Akhodiat.
And an interesting detail of hilt - it is triangular, the top pentagonal. Last edited by Gustav; 1st July 2025 at 11:46 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|