Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Yesterday, 08:40 PM   #1
urbanspaceman
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 635
Default Peter Munsten and family

Name:  ice_screenshot_20170915-143346.jpeg
Views: 28
Size:  160.4 KB

When the English civil war began, Benjamin Stone (principle mill owner in Hounslow) relocated to Oxford to serve the King; Cromwell then commandeered 'SOME' of the Hounslow mills and converted them to powder mills. Along with Stone there were various German smiths in Oxford e.g. Peter Munsten (the younger) and Heinrich Hoppie (senior). Two others were Heinrich Hoppie (the younger) and Peter Henekells, who returned to Hounslow, then left with Dell for Shotley Bridge in 1685.
It has been stated by various chroniclers that Hoppie (Sr) and Munsten - in an attempt to return to work at their mills in Hounslow – had petitioned the Crown and the Cutlers Guild but were rejected by both: this is not the case.
Ref. Tom Girtin: The Mark of the Sword (A narrative history of the Cutlers Company)
"As early as 1674 the King (Charles II) had declared that England should once again have its own sword manufactory; the Cutlers Guild had concurrently approached the Master of the King's Great Ordnance of the Tower with a view to establishing a manufactory and had also approached Munsten and Hoppie seeking their involvement.
Despite such favourable beginnings, nothing came of it; here was one of those schemes that simply did not come to fruition. Hoppie and Munsten subsequently sent this petition directly to the King, and yet again it was without result."
"In 1629 they were brought over to England by William Heyden and the late King (Charles 1st) and set up their manufacturies at Hounslow; that in the wars they followed his majesty to Oxford, for which Cromwell took their mills from them and converted them into powder mills; that they only remain who know the Art and foreign workmen are hard to obtain, as they are obliged to swear, on leaving the trade, not to discover it on the pain of death; that his majesty ordered the late Colonel to see them provided for, which he doubtless would have done had he lived; and that his majesty desire of setting up the said manufacture in England may be performed by the instructions of the said Hoppie and Munsten, if they receive his majesty’s encouragement."
(KF) We now know that the Crown had developed other plans for an English sword manufactory – out of reach of the City of London, the Cutler's Guild and Parliament. Also, at that time, import agents had brought in huge quantities of very low priced blades which had saturated the London market; nothing new there then.
urbanspaceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:46 AM   #2
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,336
Default

This family of Solingen swordsmiths is one of the more complex it would seem, mostly from their movements as well as having same names.
The Bezdek entry focused on the name change to Peter English and the convention of using Peter Munsten the elder, and Peter Munsten the younger adds to this with the name change.

I think James Mann ("Wallace Collection", 1962) confuses things with the comment, 'this Peter Munsten who went to London could not be the one who was mayor of Solingen'........
Also unclear is exactly when Hounslow began, noting the date span 1620-1634.

Peter Munsten the ELDER (1552-1628) who was indeed mayor of Solingen for a period, actually did go to London for a short period due to the troubles of the Thirty Years War (1618-1648) but returned to Solingen.
Munsten worked in Solingen along with Johannes Hoppe, who used the mark of a wildman, and for a time Munsten did as well. They along with others went to Hounslow (it is confusing as London is noted, and Munsten did have a very few swords marked with his name and ME FECIT LONDON).


He is the MUNSTEN associated with the RUNNING WOLF incorporated with his name on a rapier and ME FECIT SOLINGEN.

His son, Peter Munsten the YOUNGER (1580-1629) also was noted in Solingen, and apparently for a time used a Madonna and Child mark, but used the MOORS HEAD as well. This Moors Head had apparently been a family mark used by his father, as well as his grandfather ANDREAS MUNSTEN. He also spelled his name PETHER, as seen on some blades.
He also went to Hounslow and stayed .

He was the one who changed his name to PETER ENGLISH in Hounslow.

The grandfather ANDREAS MUNSTEN was the progenitor and in Solingen used marks with crown and AM 1547-1587......1587 -1610 he worked in TOLEDO, where he used the moors head as well as an A in a shield.

The pages shown are from "The Wallace Collection", James Mann, 1962,

and "European Makers of Edged Weapons, Their Marks" , Staffan Kinman, 2015.

It would seem that the elder Munsten did use the running wolf in accord with his name and me fecit Solingen, which is where the association came in.

I thought my geneology was bad!! yikes!
Attached Images
  
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.