![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,084
|
I look forward to that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,409
|
I bought the lot for the parts, the hilt with mendak and selut, the gandar with the fitting pendok with tortoise shell inlay, the interesting looking blade, the nice Malay sheath, the Madura janggelan hilt, all parts alone worth the paid price.
Last edited by Sajen; 3rd June 2025 at 10:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 175
|
A similar one from my collection
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,409
|
Hello Hugh,
Not really, have a look again! ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,409
|
It's a repair or a restoration, from the workmanship very well done!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,409
|
Otherwise it's a rather nice Tilam Upih keris.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,084
|
Thank you for showing these images Detlef.
I'm probably not going to win any friends with these following comments, so I'll apologise in advance. I do agree that the joining of the wood and the finish on the wrongko has been neatly done, however I am unable to agree that it has been well done. This form of wrongko is intended to be worn as an item of formal dress, and as such it must conform to a very particular pattern. The repair to this scabbard has not followed the pattern at all, & this scabbard could not be worn as an item of dress. If this repair had been done in Solo the correct pattern would have been followed, so it is very obvious that this repair has been done outside the culture, and in my opinion this wrongko should be replaced. Others might have a different opinion, & I feel no compulsion to try to convince anybody that my opinion is correct. Again, my apologies. But the blade, hilt selut, mendak are all pretty nice, they do deserve better than they presently have. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|