![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2025
Posts: 8
|
![]()
It's pretty.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 620
|
![]()
I don't know how I overlooked this one:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 620
|
![]()
I've been back to explore this sword some more, beginning with finding a better image.
Here's what I've found - and please correct me whenever necessary. First, the hilt was from John Carman II (Holborn, London) in 1753. The blade, however, is one of the early Shotley Bridge output i.e. 1688 onwards. Considering how many of Washington's military ancestors were from the North East of England the blade has obviously been a family heirloom re-hilted as a presentation to GW on the occasion of his first commission. It is telling that, from then on, when using a smallsword, he favoured colichemarde blades. For example, in 1767 his first colichemarde arrived, in parts, from London, and he gave his previous smallsword to Major George Lewis who was his sister's son and his aide-de-camp during the revolution. ps Notice the indication of frequent sharpening to remove nicks. Last edited by urbanspaceman; 6th June 2025 at 12:41 PM. Reason: typo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 620
|
![]()
Following up further, here is the colichemarde he ordered from London.
The cutler was Matthew Feesey: the King's cutler. There was also a silversmith involved of course, but I found - then lost - his name. Any takers? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|