![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,212
|
![]() Quote:
I personally agree with you, I would classify this example as Straits Bugis keris, through the parallel batang I would rule out Bugis Sulawesi. Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Detlef,
I'm more leaning towards Bugis-influenced blade from the northern Melayu regions. Hilt & scabbard seem consistent, too. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,212
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for your comment. As I said at the beginning, I'm not sure and had considered that. Are you able to justify that? Are you able to show a similar example? Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
Need new glasses.... disregard
Last edited by Gavin Nugent; 6th February 2024 at 06:13 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
I can't get a read on it as a whole. IF I was to through out a guess i'd say Sumatran side of the northern straits.
Question, is the blade true to the sheath? I ask as there is extra worn opening at the gonjo end where it typically should be sitting over that space. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,212
|
![]() Quote:
Another option I had reservations about but like always I can be very wrong! ![]() Quote:
Regards, Detlef |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]() Quote:
Some wear can be expected from the belalai, yet I don't expect the kerawang to wear so much away. This is how I see a the blades should be seated in original dress. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]() Quote:
The blending of styles across the sarung, hulu and blade, I did not recognise as harmonious, and I still ask questions to my peers and mentors most weeks as there are always little nuances that are sometimes overlooked, in my case, on items I have had for years. It was what I personally could not see as harmonious that prompted me to save the photos and zoom in, hence the need glasses comments above, then I saw in more detail these gaps. For reference, I have several keris here that I can interchange the sarung and blades for a perfectly acceptable fit, so I can see how you came to feel this about the piece you have. I feel it is OK to have wear on older examples on the belalai side, and perhaps even a little sunken in on this side of the sampir, but not the kerawang end, it doesn't make practical sense to me. Unravelling the confusion in my mind when viewing this as a whole leads me to think Sumatra side, particularly coupled with the gonjo shape, which can be Perak too, but other aspects of the blade I don't see Perak at all. I kind of get glimpses of Kedah in small parts, but aligned with certain angles in the features and luks, and the clear hexagonal cross section, I come back to Bugis Sumatra. Regardless, these things can be changed if desired or required. It is a genuine old blade and all aspects of the dress carry appropriate age aligning with the blade. Last edited by Gavin Nugent; 9th February 2024 at 08:29 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|