![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 29
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I am not going for the lathe idea the carving must mean something to them .Even modern knobkerries are hand carved .
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,247
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I'm not arguing that the carvings are meaningless.  I am saying that the heads on these club heads do not appear to be carved into a botanical pattern.  I'm puzzled by the dimple at the top of the head.  There are three reasons that I can think of for such a dimple: 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	1) it's artistic (always possible, but it can be a fancy way of saying "I don't know, but it must have been put there for a reason"). 2) the tree these came from has a central pith (like a walnut), and the central pit is an unavoidable remnant of that pith. I've got a number of walnut walking sticks, harvested locally, and the central pith doesn't particularly look like the dimples on these clubs. It's not impossible, just unlikely IMHO. 3) it's a result of the manufacturing process, suggesting that the club was turned on a lathe (either spring-cranked or machine). I agree that this is explanation works better for the shaft than the head, but it's still my favorite. F  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |