![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,229
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,272
|
![]()
Agree with the others, a very nice blade!
![]() Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
![]()
Gentlemen,
please compare the crispness of the details of figure and the state of remnants of Greneng. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,048
|
![]()
Yes Gustav, that Singa does look a bit less worn than other parts of the keris, but when we understand the how, when, where & why of various symbols to a Balinese keris blade, this is not really something of great importance.
The only way I can form a definite opinion on whether a symbol such as this Singa is a addition to a blade is by examination of the blade under magnification. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
![]()
Alan, a bit less worn in this case is an euphemism.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,048
|
![]()
I do try to be gentle Gustav, especially when I'm looking at an image on a computer monitor. The photo that we're trying to see things in is simply not good enough to show the grain of the metal, to see that we need good light & something like about a 5X jeweler's loupe.
But then, even if we did find that the singa was indeed a later addition, we still would not know why it was an addition, & that is really the crux of the matter. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Thank you everyone! I popped in this morning to check the responses and was very surprised to see so many comments. I will clean up and post more photos for sure! Thanks again!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,229
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|