![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 66
|
![]()
I have always been one to hold with the old saying ''we live and learn'', and that there are no experts in anything, but there are those who have lived and learned and are willing to pass on good knowledge
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
|
![]() Quote:
AMEN! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,224
|
![]()
On advice of a friend, I've bent the upper guard quillion forward back in a more forward position; I also note that the photos above lack scale, the grip is comfortably two-handed at 7 in., and the 28.75 in. blade is heavy (and very sharp). It is not a nimble cutlass, it's a brutal hacker.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 66
|
![]()
Hi Wayne, well you certainly fixed that and did a fine job of it, congratulations.
In my own estimation and I am by far NOT an expert I would be looking towards Vietnam for origin and age 19thc for your sword, the finish on the blade certainly has that tell tale finish seen on many Vietnam - Indo China regional swords, perhaps even what were the Cham regions, I like it, nice honest sword indeed. ![]() ![]() Last edited by Maj-Biffy Snodgrass; 21st May 2023 at 04:10 PM. Reason: mistake |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|