![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2021 
				Location: Bristol 
				
				
					Posts: 149
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I had a 1796 HCS by Woolley which had a crown / 12 inspection stamp.
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2013 
				Location: Scotland 
				
				
					Posts: 369
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks Triarii, great post! 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Woolley definitely made 1804s so that confirms the stamp on the cutlass. It may even be the same stamp as the serif at the top of the numeral one is missing or feint on both blades.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Arms Historian 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Route 66 
				
				
					Posts: 10,670
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			While we have been focused on naval references here obviously, this M1796 blade with crown over 12 is interesting so checked Robson (1975).  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	On p.191: It is noted that from 1796 + swords from whatever source were inspected for quality at the Tower, and these view marks began to appear, initially a crown over single number, on the 1796 swords it notes these were not always discernible. In 1820 the govt. view marks added a letter between the crown and inspectors number, i.e. B=Birmingham, E=Enfield, The example in Robson uses this configuration : crown E 13 So I wonder if the 12 might suggest later mfg. as the 13 coincides with the 1820 beginning of use of the letter designator. David, thank you  .....yes, the shocks on the bookmobile are groaning!
		 | 
| 
		
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |