Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 14th February 2023, 07:58 PM   #1
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,295
Default

This is an amazing thread Capn, and interesting, but understandable, that these kinds of tools could easily serve as weapons whether naval shipboard arms, settlers tools or indeed American Indian weapons. It has been known of course that Indian tomahawks of assorted forms were of manufacture of American or European source from the 18th c. on.

The Underhill Edge Tool Co. began in 1820s with forge on Chester Rd. near Auburn, N.H.
In 1835, they acquired mill in Auburn Village and continued forging.

In 1852, George Underhill (1815-1882) with John Guage and other investors created Nashua Edge Tool Co.

In 1879 Nashua Edge acquired Amokeag Axe. Co.

In 1890 American Axe and Tool bought Nashua Edge.
They closed Nashua plant and moved to Douglas , Mass. as Douglas Axe mfg. but continued the Underhill brand.

It sounds like UNDERHILL name as a brand was kept. through these name changes (see attached 1859 catalog, reprinted 1980 by Ken Roberts publ.)

It seems like UNDERHILL was stamped on one side of head, with AMERICAN AXE on other.
Other examples with Underhill one side, O on the other.

In a somber but intriguing note, It is said that LIZZIE BORDEN used an UNDERHILL axe in the heinous murders that she was charged with in Fall River, Mass. Aug.14,1892.

However the forensics of this murder and clouded evidence were likely the reason she was acquitted. Actually, in the basement there were two hatchets; two axes and a hatchet head with broken handle found.
While none had blood on blades, presumably the broken handle was assumed due to that use.
The first pic (a poll axe) is the one purportedly used by Lizzie.

In other literature, the axe shown with images of Lizzie is a curious spike type, but no further detail offered......curious.
Attached Images
      

Last edited by Jim McDougall; 15th February 2023 at 01:06 AM.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2023, 04:58 PM   #2
M ELEY
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,166
Default

Wow! Thank you, Jim, for this thorough information on the Underhill company and the connection with the Borden murder case, one of the most infamous in United States history! I seriously had no idea how far back the initial company existed, nor how long into the early twentieth they survived! My argument still stands that in the earlier and mid-19th, whether it was a blacksmith-wrought or trip hammer-forged spike axe, it would have been highly looked upon by native peoples. The spike tomahawk always existed as a tool/weapon in those earlier times. For those that shun the later 'hardware store' types (usually the pipe axe collectors whose taste and price range are admittedly on a far different level that the simple spikes), I'd remind that even the pipes were later cast models, many made of brass and pewter (not warrior axes by any means, but more ceremonial/hierarchy-based). Thank you again, JIm, for this archive of information, photocopied prints, etc! It really adds to the whole story of the developing axes in North America and their role in history!
M ELEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2025, 01:46 AM   #3
M ELEY
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,166
Default A few new additions to the collection...

Here we have a couple of nice, authentic 'skull hammers'. Sorry for the grim reference, but these types were both weapon and tool, traded to the Native Americans from the times of the early 1600's up until the turn of the 20th century-
Attached Images
  
M ELEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2025, 01:59 AM   #4
M ELEY
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,166
Default An old spike tomahawk-

Here we have the classic spike-tomahawk type. This one was purchased from a fellow Forumite, Mark Golab (thanks, my friend!). The head is hand-forged, with an old steel bit fitted into the bearded edge. Forging flaws present on this piece, the elongated eye fitted with a later haft of cherry? The head measures 9" from spike tip to blade edge, with the cutting edge measuring 2 1/8" width. It is fairly well balanced, very sharp and I would hope to never get hit by it!

In Robert Kuck's "Tomahawks Illustrated", page 76, plate 208B , we see a very similar example. Much of Kuck's examples in his guide came from around the Ohio Valley, so I suspect this might be a Great Lakes pattern. Who knows? Maybe it saw action at the Battle of Falling Timbers?!
Attached Images
   
M ELEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2025, 02:15 AM   #5
M ELEY
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,166
Default Hammer poll 'tomahawk' trade axe

Here we have a nice hammer poll axe that was obviously sold to a Native American, who refitted it with trade beads and a nice curving haft. The head is of a wedge-shaped pattern, blacksmith-made with oval eye. The shape of the haft was a popular feature around mid-century (ca 1850), but the head probably much earlier. The incredible beadwork, with tiny thread, were trade 'seed' beads and they were from the period 1760 all the way up to the late 19th. These trade beads are from Venice (where the vast majority of trade beads came from. 'Wampum', fine Venician glass beads sewn onto fabric or hide, was both a sign of power and importance among the Indian tribes). This chevron pattern is particularly eye-catching.

This axe came from an old house in the Efland, North Carolina region (a flat pastural region in the Piedmont that is still very rural even in modern times). The chief tribes in NC were the Waccamaw (coastal), Catawba (central NC) and Cherokee (mountain regions), so I believe one of these tribes to have possessed this axe. The head measures 6" from hammer to edge, with the blade width 2 1/2".
Attached Images
  
M ELEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2025, 02:39 AM   #6
M ELEY
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,166
Default

There is a huge devide among historians on the use of the term 'tomahawk' when it comes to hammer poll axes versus the classic types. Likewise, there are varying opinions as to whether Native Americans used hammer poll axes versus the more-practical-for-warfare pipe tomahawks/spike tomahawks/halberd tomahawks and Missouri war axes. I am of the solid opinion that hammer polls were traded and used by the Native Americans just as they were to settlers, fur traders and soldiers of the era. After all, the main reason the Indians valued the iron tools so much was that their stone axes (a tool and weapon) didn't hold up as well over time. Native Americans had many uses for iron tools. Perhaps the formerly mentioned weapon axes were more popular with the natives, but to say that no Indians ever used them seems laughable.

As far as the term 'tomahawk' goes, this was a word/description given to these axe types by the white men, although the word was Indian and simply meant 'axe'. Ship's log books from the early 17th century referred to the multiple types of axes coming to the New World as 'tomahawks', 'tomnahawks', 'Tomahaks', etc. We associate this term to mean axes traded to the native peoples in exchange for furs at the time. In the early periods, they would have been simple poll axes an later, spike and halberd hea types. It really wasn't until the early 19th c. that the pipe tomahawk made it's grand appearance. These axes were highly prized by the Indians (and later collectors!!!), but one has to remember these types were made of very fine materials and decorated for very important men among the tribes (chiefs, medicine-men, high-ranking warriors). They were prized possessions not every average brave carried one. This is an important point and is proven by the scarcity of pipe axes as compared to the common spike or hammer poll axe. Yet in almost EVERY studio pic or Southwest photo, there is the brave with the brass PIPE tomahawk! Why this discrepency? Why so few pics of braves with spike tomahawks, hammer polls, or halberd types? I say for two reasons.#1 is that many of these were STUDIO pics and they dressed the warriors with the weapons almost everyone associates with the tribes. And #2, because many of the pics of the time featured powerful chiefs, who would indeed be carrying their favorite pipe tomahawks!

So, the point of this is to lend support that hammer-poll axes were still tomahawks if proven to be Indian-used. Here is a pic of a hammer tomahawk similar to mine from Lar Hothem's "Indian Trade Relics", pg 113.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by M ELEY; 5th May 2025 at 02:52 AM.
M ELEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2025, 12:54 PM   #7
CutlassCollector
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 357
Default

Hi Mark,

Great to re-read this thread and to see your recent additions to your collection - both nice axes.
We are familiar with the link to boarding axes and as Gilkerson pointed out, even though the Royal Navy did not officially call them Tomahawks the name was in common use by the sailors and in ship's manifests and journals.

Conversely War Office records state that ‘the Ordnance issued 300 Tommihawks on 12th August 1761 to the 2nd Battalion of the Royal Americans’ and in 1784 the 22nd Regiment is recorded as adopting it as a standard sidearm '.
Yet another spelling of tomahawk! Unfortunately it does not make clear whether these were hammer poll or spike axes.
CC
CutlassCollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.