![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2019 
				Location: Eastern Sierra 
				
				
					Posts: 511
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It looks like Rajasthan to me. The question I have wondered is are many of these old parts mixed with new, or all new with aging to some areas?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Louisville, KY 
				
				
					Posts: 7,345
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I had one of these with Urdu on it the was made in the 1960s - several decades also therefore also.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2014 
				Location: Austria 
				
				
					Posts: 1,912
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yes, this is indeed of recent production.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Moreover, I do not consider this to be a pesh-kabz as it doesn't have any of the characteristics that define the pesh-kabz. It does neither have the long, sleek blade with a T- spine, nor the typical hilt adapted for under-hand grip. I would call this knife a zirah-bouk as it has the typical reinforced "armour piercing" tip. I have seen many modern versions of this type of knife but very, very few that are genuinely antique.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Louisville, KY 
				
				
					Posts: 7,345
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			You bring up a good point (every pun intended  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 )
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Room 101, Glos. UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,259
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Definitely indian zirah-bouk-ish, but a bit crude. Grip doesn't look like it is intended for that blade. 
		
		
		
			Mine, late 20c +/- Zirah Bouk. I bought it because I liked it.  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2014 
				Location: Austria 
				
				
					Posts: 1,912
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yep, this would be a typical zirah-bouk. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			And I like it too!   I wonder if any forum member can post some images and information about a genuinely antique, 19th century zirah-bouk?! �� I am asking because I haven't seen any in all the museums I have visited in India (and I have visited quite a few). Moreover, from the practical point of view, all the zirah-bouks I have seen, while looking very impressive and attractive, are of almost no practical use whatsoever. The heavily recurved blade does not provide a good and stable transmission of the force to the tip of the knife, and the very thick tip is very badly suited for armour penetration. In fact, these knives because of their thickened tips are worse at armour penetration than pretty much any ordinary khanjar/jambiya or kard. So, I suspect these knives are mostly a 20th century development for the tourist market. Last edited by mariusgmioc; 30th October 2022 at 03:46 PM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Room 101, Glos. UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,259
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 the spike on pole-axes, halberds, Guden tags, and even some rondels, of much the same cross section & shapes, ruined the days of many an armoured knight, not penetrating the armour, but the gaps, throats, eyes, ears, etc. An unarmoured Indian warrior would be very vulnerable, I would think, tho personally I'd rather have a nice sharp bowie.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Feb 2018 
				
				
				
					Posts: 90
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Zirah bouk are ultimately though still functional designs. They might not actually be the "bestest armor piercer ever", nor used on the historical battlefield, but they are still far from the zaniest weapon type - made for tourists or not - created and/or used in India. Like Ariel said, if it is sharpened it would still be useful in a bar fight  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Ann Arbor, MI 
				
				
					Posts: 5,503
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 This one is a crude and recent khanjar-like ( double edged) souvenir with a zirah bouk tip . If it is sharpened, it can be very useful in a midnight bar melee.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |