![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 252
|
![]()
Congratulations on a very rare example. From the attached you can see that it once had a fully functional matchlock firing mechanism , now missing. Looking on the PAS database you will see plenty of other examples which usually have only the flash pan for manual ignition. The petronel form seems to have persisted probably into the eighteenth century but I am confident that your example is certainly early seventeenth century although you could argue the ball but makes it possibly late sixteenth century.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 46
|
![]()
Wow that’s incredible. All of the other examples I have seen have the same shaped pommel as the one you pictured but I haven’t seen one with a round ball but before. late 16th century would be quite amazing
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
hello
I think this is a toy and for that reason, it is missing the lid of the bowl (bread) affectionately |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 46
|
![]()
Yes it is a toy as I stated in the title
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 46
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 252
|
![]() Quote:
if anyones wondering about the strange shape of the end of the barrel on the second example this is actually the end of the ramrod which is reversed and screwed into the barrel Last edited by Raf; 1st August 2022 at 12:09 PM. Reason: additional information. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,231
|
![]()
In one of my drawers I found a toy miniature of a matchlock pistol unfortunately missing the cock. It is 77 mm long and made of bronce. The former owner once told me that this item has been found in the mud of the river Thames near London.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 252
|
![]()
The ball but on this one looks completely wrong.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|