Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 13th June 2006, 07:04 AM   #8
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,855
Default

The blade on this is not a "good blade" the sword is a concept similar to the jibbeh of the pious that were designed to show the qualities of an ascetic, a beggar in virtuous poverty, newly made with tears and patches and crude stitching. The rebellion was above all a religious movement. This weapon if we can call it that, is a symbol of rank for a noncombatant in the physical sense, more like a political officer in the soviet army of ww2, the first to get the chop. The owner of a sword like this would have been as I mentioned before; a cleric or an orator, a military cheer leader so to speak, only without the legs. How many real peasants had a sword of any kind especially one that does not work and covered with expensive etching. So the idea of a good or bad blade some how misses the point a little.
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.