![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]() Quote:
Folks, this thread must NOT become about Religion or Politics. Let's scrupulously avoid going down that path and focus on the weapons. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
My undestanding is that Kindjal is a typically Caucasian weapon. All along, Caucasians of various ethnicities and religions were very active in foreign militaries (Mameluke in Egypt and, especially, in Persia. In the latter, they might have constituted the bulk of the military). Also, frequent invasions from Persia and Turkey displaced many of them into the victors' hinterlands.
This is a classical scenario for the spread of a particular weapon type. I have a typical Kindjal, but it has a rhino handle and alligator (lizard?) skin stips on the scabbard: a very likely "Sudanese" type. As to single-edge or double-edge... If Shashka is a "big knife", there is no reason why single-edge Kindjals could not have been also used in, say, Circassia. Are we saying that a single-edge Kindjal is a Persian development? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
![]() Quote:
While I can not deny a chanse of such weapons created in parallel elseswhere, since kindjals are somewhat similar to ancient daggers - as in attachment (2500bc). Now, other images coming with this post - two short transcaucasian "qaudaras" - almost completely straight blades, single edge and armenian family from Nagorny Karabagh (?), boy has a small knife-like quadara. One of quadaras is photographed at the angle, so it is a little bit distorted. Last edited by Andrew; 12th June 2006 at 09:56 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|