![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]() Quote:
We are left with the possibility that the joint between the two parts of this dagger took the idea from N. Indian katars: some kind of braising ( but we do not see any trace of brass or silver ) or having a split outcropping of the handle, inserting the base of the blade into the created gap and forging them together. If that was the case, the connection is likely to be strong and practical. But the handle itself is awfully awkward for a good grip. Again: not a comfortable weapon, but a beautiful one. The chamfered edge of the blade was immensely popular on Afghani Ch'hurras and " khybers". NW India and Afghanistan are both likely possibilities. Last edited by ariel; 24th May 2022 at 04:56 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 82
|
![]()
Well I can confirm that it's not comfortable to hold in any way, shape, or form.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,224
|
![]() Quote:
Another possibility is a 'shrink fit' where the tang is slightly larger than the grip opening, which is heated to enlarge the opening, tang quickly inserted, and the grip shrinks as it cools again, imprisoning the tang permanently. p.s.- Many Indo-Persian arms have grips that are uncomfortable for 'modern' hands who will likely not hold them the same as the blade's contemporary user. Last edited by kronckew; 27th May 2022 at 11:15 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|