Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 19th February 2022, 08:22 PM   #5
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Post

Hello Detlef & Mel,

I agree that the hilt is most certainly borrowed. The British had a strong presence, especially on Sumatra, and kept trading even after the Dutch took over again (but still had not taken over all of Sumatra until into the 20th century).

However, this is not from greater Aceh and, thus, not a peurawot. Typical peurawot have a classic blade shape while there are also some examples exhibiting deviating blade shapes like the one shown by Detlef.

This scabbard is different despite some similarities in carving at the mouth. Details are not Aceh style though.

This blade is a rawit. If this ensemble got not assembled by one of the Batak groups, the blade might as well had travelled to one of the coastal communities and trading ports and possibly got adapted locally. Just brainstorming though.

Closeups of the carving might help to place it (please include both sides and a top view, Roy).

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.