![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Thank you Jim, for sharing all that knowledge.
I will follow your assumption on the " but there were of course exceptions " part. Whether 'my' author mentioning could be a fantasy, i find more than one source admitting that the pipe-back sword was fragile indeed. "As a fighting weapon, the 1822 Pattern was rather unsatisfactory, the blade being far too weak and the hilt bars affording little protection". https://www.militariahub.com/british...officer-sword/ Besides the fragility issue, this could mean (these) infantry swords were still "serviceable" ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
I would like to say that i found the support text of this item when it was last included in an auction.
"Spanish, with a repurposed sword blade". Judging by the fact that also the Spanish had their version of the 1822 pipe-back, it all makes sense ... i would say. . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
|
![]() Quote:
as they say here in Texas, "..well....there ya go!" ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
All's well that ends well
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|