![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,214
|
![]() Quote:
You were the one who has identified this type of sword as binakla, yes there are slight differences in the handle styles but generally they could get named as inaso, dog or bat style. Blade style is by nearly all examples (this thread and the one I posted) nearly similar. So when one gets called binakla I call a very similar sword as well as binakla, also when it gets called in Masbate or Samar differently. It's a cultural and linguistic related region. So when a knowledgeable person would say it's very similar but maybe from Masbate or Samar but simply saying it's for sur not Bicol at last is courageous IMVHO. ![]() ![]() Quote:
Regards, Detlef Last edited by Sajen; 20th October 2021 at 05:39 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,399
|
![]()
Here are the additional pictures of the blade I posted above. The thickness of the spine just in front of the hilt is 8.5 mm measured with a micrometer. The width of the blade tapers quickly moving away from the hilt, and the cutting area of the blade is about 3-4 mm wide for much of its length, tapering further to 1-2 mm wide near the tip. The clipped spine has a sharp back edge for about 20 cm. Both the regular and back edges are razor sharp and symmetrically V-ground (not chisel-ground). The regular cutting edge has been quench hardened.
The hilt has finger cut outs and what appears to be a bat's head for the pommel. The hilt is full tang. Length of blade = 48.0 cm (18.9 in), length of hilt = 13.8 cm (5.4 in). . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|