|
|
|
16th May 2021, 10:19 PM
|
#1 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
So Jim, as you confirm, semantics are not the issue. And you are putting in many words what i have just said in a short clumsy way
 .
|
|
|
|
17th May 2021, 12:10 AM
|
#2 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,668
|
Quote:
Not at all, what I meant was that semantically the author of the 1656 inventory was describing the sword/item in question as a cutlass, his choice of term, but he might have been describing any number of weapons of the time used in a cutting or chopping manner. Unfortunately there is no illustration for us to know exactly what he meant, but semantically presume it is our perception of a 'cutlass'. Words can be confounding and often confusing, which is why I, as you often note, use more words to try to qualify what I am saying. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
