![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 415
|
OK, I'll bite.
They look to me as if they could be the shoe of a lance or pike, rather than the head. And I can't see a reason why they shouldn't be old. Regards Richard |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Do you think so, Ricard ?
... with such (would be) long langets ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 162
|
I'm not sure about that. The decorated thickening in the center looks like something that you would find on a wild bore hunting spear, for preventing entering to deep. But I am not sure either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
This being the head end of a lance, i don't see in its design any such purpose ... if you don't mind
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 763
|
Pike heads, 1500s. Armour piercing.
Congratulations. They are beautiful! Last edited by Victrix; 25th January 2021 at 08:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 162
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,206
|
Victrix, thank you for that pic of armor-piercing heads. I was always under the assumption that this style of head was very late in pike history. Naval pikes with 4 sides appeared around 1800, whereas their diamond-headed and leaf-shaped patterns preceded this form, but this is apparently ONLY in naval pikes. Interesting!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
(depictions dated XIV and XVI centuries). . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 415
|
The general consensus is these are pike heads, and I'm not going to disagree, but I will explain why I thought there is a possibility they may be shoes.
1, They are square sided; not unknown, but unusual for a pike head. 2, The spike, or bodkin, is only 10cm long. This may be sufficient to penetrate a thick coat and armour, but only just. Bearing in mind pikes were a defence against cavalry, most horses could probably survive a jab of only 10cms, especially if protected. 3, Further, there is a possibility that if the ball is shoved through anything like mail or armour it would prove a hindrance in disengaging the weapon. 4, There seems to be a 'flow' in most pikes, even those with a ball or ring, from the tip through to the shaft which is missing here. The spike stops abruptly at the ball and there is a definite 'shoulder' where it meets the shaft. 5, If they are shoes they do not have to be from a pike. They could be the shoes of, say, a halberd or spontoon which was pre-eminently a parade weapon. 6, I cannot explain what seems to be unnecessarily long langets for a shoe. Best wishes Richard |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|